When a baby is born in Australia or any other so called developed country, orthodox medicine immediately takes over its life and wellbeing: the very birth is medicalised with inductions (whether there is any medical need for it or not), painkillers and immediate injections of vitamin K and hepatits B vaccine. Mothers do not even ask what is in that drip (it is an overload of a hormone: oxytocin) and in that vitamin K injection; they do not realise that it is the wrong vitamin K, that there are toxic preservatives in the injection and that the babies have developed the so-called haemorrhagic disease of the newborn despite being given vitamin K. They don’t realise that the painkiller pethidine is morphine and that the newborn baby may get the full blast of it while being born; not the most auspicious start in life. Some even linked the addictions of very young children to that initial bolus of morphine. The mothers don’t realise that an overload of the hormone oxytocin may (and does) cause brain and retinal haemorrhages and that before the baby would recover, it is given hepatitis b vaccine injection which on its own causes brain and retinal haemorrhages. The vicious circle may continue if the baby is deemed to have an infection and is administered powerful antibiotics intravenously; many babies develop serious reactions to all this and die within about 3-4 weeks of being born. If they survive the initial assault of these toxic substances, then they may develop reactions to the second round at two months: injections of several other vaccines such as DPT (diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus), polio, Haemophilus influenzae type B, the second hepatitis B, and meningococcal and Pneumococcal vaccines, in each thigh. The babies are vaccinated even after they developed symptoms of suppressed immune system such as the runny nose and ear infections after the first toxic assault at birth. Many babies develop whooping cough from the vaccine. I suspect that many babies who developed convulsions after these vaccinations, may have actually contracted tetanus, from the triple (DPRT) vaccine.

The next assault that follows is administration of antibiotics. Not just one, usually two, of the second and third generation of the so-called broad spectrum antibiotics. Many babies then react by developing subdural and retinal haemorrhages or re-bleeds if they had the initial bleeds caused by oxytocin and the first hepatitis B vaccine injection. Just after I published the first edition of my book “Vaccination” in late 1993, I was interviewed on a live radio show about it; a medical doctor phoned-in and indignantly criticised me for writing that first it was going to be just babies of ethnic mothers and then suddenly all mothers somehow became infected with hepatitis B disease and their babies are going to be given this vaccine. How prophetic my words were! True, the vaccine was initially developed for high-risk groups of adults (such as prostitutes and practicing homosexuals), but because they rejected it or were hard to be forced to take it, the vaccinators targeted the babies because they were accessible. Yes, every time the babies are taken to the well-baby clinics, they become accessible to the deadly ministrations of the medical system. In their misguided effort to do the best for their babies, and due to a widely spread ignorance and gullibility, mothers easily succumb to the pressure from the pro-vaccinators. People forget only too easily the age-old knowledge and experience that infectious diseases are actually beneficial for children because they are the ones that prime and mature the immune system and represent developmental milestones.

We live in the age of information and communication; the knowledge is at everybody’s fingertips, literally. However, people mostly do not really take the advantage of the modern technology. Most people think that they know things while they don’t. Worse still, they know the wrong things. They listen or access the propaganda of those who are developing, producing, distributing and administering such deadly products as vaccines. I lived for twenty years under a communist regime in former Czechoslovakia; even though we were bombarded with the official government’s propaganda, we knew that it was full of lies. We saw that in real life, despite the government’s ravings about the quality of life under communism, the opposite was true. We were bringing up our children to see the truth and recognise the lies without necessarily showing it (it was dangerous to speak the truth). I was extremely worried when we emigrated how easily a dictatorship could develop in the western countries simply because people generally believed their politicians or those who were selling their products. People did not check the facts, they simply believed the words. Many still do. That’s why they would vote for thoroughly corrupt people who enter politics for their own agendas. There is a saying that buck stops with someone; however, there is another side to this proverb, namely that the buck starts with someone. The buck starts with the voters, constituents, patients and citizens who, I may say sadly, are often as ignorant and misguided, or more so than people were in the Middle Ages. People these days think that they know things or the truth, while they are just dangerously ignorant and, worse still, knowing the wrong things and not knowing the true facts and the truth. The same applies to other matters such as the health of their own and their families: the buck starts with parents making the correct or incorrect decisions based on either real knowledge and the right information or lies and propaganda and the hollow assurances of those who make and administer vaccines, that they are safe and effective.

Vaccine are neither safe nor effective in preventing any disease; they cause diseases; they are the single biggest cause of infant deaths. The lies about this useless, dangerous medieval medical procedure reached monstrous proportions with the accusations of innocent parents and other carers (nannies) effectively causing the vaccine reactions.

When babies develop brain and retinal haemorrhages after vaccination, often the same medical doctors who injected them become accusers of the gullible, ignorant and innocent carers of the shaken baby syndrome. This glaring nonsence started in 1946 with John Caffey, a formally untrained paediatric radiologist in Utah (USA). He misinterpreted the typical signs of scurvy (caused by toxic vaccines which deplete the usually marginal reserves of vitamin C in vaccinated babies) as signs of physical assault (Scheibner 2001, 2004). The most worrying thing about this is that all those formally trained paediatric radiologists blindly follow the example of untrained and ignorant Caffey and continue perpetuating the monstrous medieval injustice of SBS.

DoCS have been criticised for inaction in cases of real child abuse. They tried to defend their non-action by asserting that they are overloaded with cases and overworked: yes, they go into an overdrive in the cases of vaccine damage and death for which the innocent carers are being blamed. Shaken baby syndrome, according to a California judge is a factitious diagnosis carefully fabricated by medical profession (to cover up their own crime of killing and maiming babies with vaccine injections).

Mind you, the accused parents of such unfortunate babies, are the ones who obediently follow doctors’ advice (or more precisely, intimidation) and allow their babies to be injected with a cocktail of toxic substances that have nothing good to deliver to their recipients. Even babies who recover from this toxic bolus, develop a host of reactions such as asthma and allergies, ear infections, pneumonia, bronchiolitis, diabetes, hyperinsulinaemia, chronic ill health, cancer, leukaemia, brain tumours, behavioural and learning difficulties, suicidal and murderous tendencies, indeed, all those modern ills of childhood. This is all happening under the guise of ‘protecting’ the health of children and allegedly preventing all those allegedly miserable and bad infectious diseases of childhood.

We live in the age of information and communication. A lot of information (sometimes an overload) is at our fingertips; however, not only a lot of this information is really not worth the paper it is written on, but very often it represents anti-information and anti-knowledge. This extends to our general education at schools of all kind and degrees, including universities. I realised that people get diploma in wrong knowledge and simply said: crap. The problem arises when they at the same time think that they know it all, and when they get jobs and power where their gaping ignorance and anti-knowledge start reeking havoc in their own and especially other peoples’ lives. I ask myself, and sometimes I ask the accused victimised parents, how come when they are affected personally, they find the right information within minutes? Why didn’t they check what those vaccine injections really contain and do before they allowed their precious babies being injected with them? A simple perusal of the National Health and Medical Research (NHMRC)’s Australian Immunisation Handbook must alert the readers that something is terribly wrong with vaccines: there are over four pages of serious reactions listed in that book, including death! It is a pro-vaccination book so they would hardly overstate the case against vaccines or publish more and non-existent reactions in it. The minimum that the parents of small children should do is to ask the pro-vaccinator doctor to show them the product information that accompanies every vaccine. They would see that the producers and distributors of vaccines are very careful to list a long list of the observed and reported side effects, even though they as a rule add that the causal link to the vaccine has not been proven. Why would they then put it in their product insert? To lie about it, to overstate the case against the vaccine? Hardly.

All the other orthodox medications are toxic and useless.

The painkillers are particularly dangerous; almost every day we hear on the news that another of these toxins caused very serious reactions, including deaths. So, what happens? The example of Vioxx is instructive in that it was stopped being distributed under that name but resurfaced and re-incarnated under different names such as Recoxib, Cox2 and other revealing names. A prominent politician went on television and effectively falsely advertised Fosamax as safe and terrific. Well, I agree that he and the likes of him should take it. If they developed necrosis of the jaw bone from it then they should be told that they only imagine it. Many people including doctors went on television and effectively denied or played down this serious reaction, yet it is listed even on the abbreviated product information.

The latest scandal is the cervical cancer vaccine. Very soon after its mass administration to very young girls, it transpired that it caused very serious reactions such as syncope, fainting, anaphylaxis, ascending paralysis (Guillain Barre syndrome) and even death. An epidemic of denials mushroomed despite many of these reactions being added to the list as post-marketing reports. Sure, the usual meaningless disclaimer accompanies the list, namely that the causal link to the offending vaccine has not been proven without qualifying what they would consider the evidence and proof of the causality. Yet, the reactions to vaccines fulfill all nine criteria of Bradford Hill, the father of medical statistics. Why would they be listed if the girls just imagined them? By the way, many girls were threatened with being admitted to a mental institution if they continued claiming that their observed serious reactions to Gardasil were caused by the vaccine. Who should be admitted into mental institutions? Surely not the girls experiencing the reactions, but those doctors and health officials who are accusing them of just imagining the experienced reactions while denying the PI listed reactions.

What happened when the recipients of the sleeping pills called inappropriately stillnight died when sleepwalking? Basically very little, just a little bandaid: a recommendation that some effects should be highlighted. How many car accidents could be or even could have been caused by those who drove (one of the recognised effects) under the influence of this deadly pill?

Perhaps the first remedy to apply would be separation of the orthodox medicine and the state, just as there was separation of the Church and the State. Hundreds of millions would be saved for better purposes (such as increasing the lower threshold for taxable income to $30000 or more) if the government stopped buying the vaccines and making them available free of charge to the unsuspecting citizens. The first thing that would happen would be an immediate hugely improved infant health (including Aboriginal babies), followed by the disappearance of autism, child diabetes, obesity (yes vaccines cause hyperinsulinaemia which is the underlying problem behind the pandemic of obesity), behavioural and learning difficulties, criminality in young offenders and all those other modern ills in the developed countries. Indeed, people in developing countries without functioning medical system are healthier than babies, children and adults in the developed countries and especially in the United States. American children are the sickest children in the world. This certainly is not a credit to their most expensive medical system. Next time when listening to the news of another school shooting in the United States, just think of their mandatory vaccination policies.

People, wake up. Start educating yourselves and stop believing the propaganda. Learn about your basic legal and human rights. Follow the money.

Many people (indeed, too many) do not know the basic legalities such as that they have a free choice of health practitioners, meaning orthodox or alternative. It is true that the alternative practitioners are discriminated against because they are not paid under the Medicare scheme. Orthodox medicine is trying very hard to have them outlawed under the pretext that their effectiveness and safety has not been tested the same way as the orthodox medications. This is really interesting because it is only too well documented that those allegedly scientifically tested and proven orthodox medications kill tens of thousands of Australian every year. How many people are killed by alternatives? None. Zero. Yet, they get those patients who were mangled by orthodoxy and they get better after the alternative treatment. Homeopathy is a particular thorn in the backside of orthodoxy and yet that is the scientific system of pharmacological medicine. It understands the dose effect of medication and its remedies are an example of a truly scientific principle of physics of polymers. Homeopathic remedies are an electromagnetic imprint of the structure of the substance on the soluent. Correctly administered, they address the individuality of disease conditions and there are no harmful side effects. After taking orthodox medications, people feel miserable, depressed, suicidal, even homicidal, while a few minutes after taking the homeopathic remedy one has a feeling of euphoria. This is particularly instructive with animals; one can hardly claim the placebo effect with animals.

We are all (justly) critical of Mugabe’s dictatorial regime in Zimbabwe. He destroyed the economy, threw (literally bulldozed) poor people out of their houses and silenced many of his opponents either by killing them or forcing them to seek refuge outside the country. Wait a minute: didn’t some of our politicians create a recession that Australia had to have? The interest rates that went through the roof and predictably bankrupted many businesses? Allowing the banking and money system to lend money to people who could not afford it and then making it even less affordable by increasing the interest rates should be prohibited and considered a crime. The loans are worked out on the affordability at the time and based on certain interest rates, and then the lenders are allowed to keep increasing them. Isn’t that creating a predictable situation of people losing their houses and being thrown out in the street? It is not as crude as Mugabe’s buldozers, but the effect is the same. Increasing prices of everything, including food, without any justification while the primary producers are paid a pittance. Corporate psychopaths making millions by literally (and legally) extorting money from their clients? Company directors paid millions while running the companies into the ground? The workers being denied their benefits and being thrown in the street after the companies fold up? Preferential treatment of big people by courts: a ruling in a case of obvious misdemeanor that the perpetrator should not be fined because for a rich person a fine of a few thousand dollars would not make any difference while sentencing little people to paying thousands of dollars in fines when it does make a huge difference to their wellbeing? Showing blatant leniency in one (privileged) area and no leniency in a disadvantaged area for the same crime? Our society is equally dishonest and unjust but it is a little more civilised about it. That’s all.